Okay, my fault. I apologize for that last post. I was being immature and childish. I promise to be more respectful now and not try and incite (or "agitate") others on these forums. I'll be good.
Sorry again
Sorry for starting drama :-(
-
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:53 pm
Re: Sorry for starting drama :-(
agitator if you have nothing constructive to say please go back to the old forums.
Re: Sorry for starting drama :-(
As opposed to your constant and repeated postings of meme images. So so constructive.
LOL@ my signature edit. Here's some "constructive" criticism: How can a server be run openly and fairly if the prevailing attitude is one that punishes people who "leak" information, and where admins can conspire amongst themselves, out of public view, to carry out personal agendas?
Pre-emptive:
LOL@ my signature edit. Here's some "constructive" criticism: How can a server be run openly and fairly if the prevailing attitude is one that punishes people who "leak" information, and where admins can conspire amongst themselves, out of public view, to carry out personal agendas?
Pre-emptive:
Re: Sorry for starting drama :-(
lol, ban
-
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:53 pm
Re: Sorry for starting drama :-(
i second thatErowid wrote:lol, ban
Re: Sorry for starting drama :-(
sorry for the drama please don't look at the new drama below.
this is not new drama it the same drama.
this is not new drama it the same drama.
Re: Sorry for starting drama :-(
Just my 2 cents worth:
While I feel censorship on a forum can ultimately and inevitably lead to corruption, I see no reason why agitator needed to post that chat log here. It's already posted on the old forum for everyone to see.
He also made it clear in his post there that "I'm going to repost that convo in the new forums for lulz"
In this case, I'd say that was intentionally "creating drama".
However he did apologize, and I think a ban at this point is premature.
This is a new forum, and like children faced with a substitute teacher, it's tempting to test the limits of what you can get away with.
Agitator now knows what those limits are, and I doubt if he'll do it again.
Was agitator creating drama? Yes
Should he be banned? No
For that reason, I'm not voting in the poll.
While I feel censorship on a forum can ultimately and inevitably lead to corruption, I see no reason why agitator needed to post that chat log here. It's already posted on the old forum for everyone to see.
He also made it clear in his post there that "I'm going to repost that convo in the new forums for lulz"
In this case, I'd say that was intentionally "creating drama".
However he did apologize, and I think a ban at this point is premature.
This is a new forum, and like children faced with a substitute teacher, it's tempting to test the limits of what you can get away with.
Agitator now knows what those limits are, and I doubt if he'll do it again.
Was agitator creating drama? Yes
Should he be banned? No
For that reason, I'm not voting in the poll.
Re: Sorry for starting drama :-(
In all fairness i dont know you that well so i just voted with everyone else
Re: Sorry for starting drama :-(
agitator if u chill out u will be fine. we are not lookin for any drama in these forums. take that to the bongs forum.
and this is final.
and this is final.
EvilTree{OZ}
Re: Sorry for starting drama :-(
on that note,
cya fags later.
cya fags later.