HM is authorized?

Owner
Site Admin
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by Owner »

I let things slide a lot and il let him have at it. Done deal for me.
Image
User avatar
DESTROID
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:46 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by DESTROID »

Kilroy spare me your off things.

2strong is an excellent leader of <!>

Kilroy you criticize the server PB that has no one playing there, there are currently no players to fill half of the seats of a server only once a day.

I came to this forum to report on an event in the country that 2 administrators confirmed use. I did not know who was the Owner could be any player. Strange when questioned about the fact both were quiet.

Okay boys, if we see in the game.

________________________________

Kilroy me poupe de suas bobeiras.

2strong é um excelente lider de <!>

Kilroy você critica o server do PB que não tem ninguém jogando lá, atualmente não há jogadores para preencherem metade das vagas de um server uma unica vez ao dia.

Eu vim até esse forum informar sobre um acontecimento no servidor em que 2 administradores confirmaram o uso. Eu não sabia que era o Owner podia ser qualquer jogador. Estranho quando questionei sobre o fato os dois ficaram quietos.

Ok meninos, se vemos no jogo.
Image
User avatar
KILROY
Posts: 1315
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by KILROY »

That's your opinion and your entitled to it. You have more leadership abilities than he.

I'm not talking about the amount of players in the Tribes Community. There are more than enough to fill a few servers these days.

What I am relaying, is that 2Strong came back after being away for over a year, relaying he moved out of his parents place. When I checked his IP, it's still the same, which confirms he DIDN'T move. Upon his return, he was telling S@ND to start up a new server. In which S@ND was already running one server. I relayed to 2Strong why S@ND shouldn't waste his time, money, and resources to host something in which something else that was being hosted was not even being used already. This is when 2Strong started off with the argument pretty much relaying what he says goes, due to S@ND giving him that right and that he lead's not myself. I wasn't trying to out rank him, I was just relaying the situation of the Tribes Community due to him being away for as long as he was. He started the feud, I was just trying to get him up to date as a courtesy of him being away for as long as he was.

Look Destroid, I already manage 300 people daily. By the actions of how 2Strong acted, I would not only have written him up with my company, I would have suspended him, and upon his return if he continued, which he did with this issue, I would have fired him. Don't tell me he knows how to lead, he never did upon myself joining the group, which I relayed to S@ND in many PM's in the past, and still does not. Like I said previously, you have more leadership qualities than he.

EDIT: Not only was this relayed to S@ND via PM's, but also personal e-mails, and myself talking to him directly over a few phone calls in the past.
perrinoia
Site Admin
Posts: 3732
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:18 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by perrinoia »

What does this have to do with whether or not Owner happy mods?
Image
User avatar
KILROY
Posts: 1315
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by KILROY »

You must have missed Owner's reply to Destroid:
If fact your a clan member of the same clan.
I assume Owner relayed this about Destroid and myself with not knowing the current situation.

I was just replying back to Owner that he was mistaken and as to why. Then Destroid made his statement and I was trying to help him understand the situation, due to 2Strong banning me from the forum before anyone in the PB clan could hear my side of the story. They only heard what 2Strong relayed to them.
perrinoia
Site Admin
Posts: 3732
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:18 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by perrinoia »

Yeah, I got all of that...

I meant, what does anyone's clan affiliation have to do with whether or not Owner cheats?
Image
User avatar
{LS}RePublic
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:04 am

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by {LS}RePublic »

Image
Image
User avatar
DaJ4ck3L
Crow{OZ}
Posts: 3375
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:51 pm
Contact:

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by DaJ4ck3L »

{LS}RePublic wrote:Image
lolol

and damn
Image
User avatar
vistalize
Posts: 840
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:20 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by vistalize »

I seriously doubt Owner would HM

But again if you think anyone in the server is HMing you guys know the process.

Until proof is posted action cannot be taken. So stop with the false accusations until then.

Thank you,
The Management


Ps: Please take this thread to the proper location. Toodles
Image
EvilTree{OZ}
User avatar
DESTROID
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:46 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by DESTROID »

Só mais uma coisa


Image
Image
Locked