Page 1 of 9

HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:57 am
by DESTROID
Hey people

The '' management '' the server BR are not banishing players using HM?

Can anyone explain to me why?

_________________

Eae galera

Os '' administradores '' do server BR não estão mais banindo jogadores que usam HM ?

Alguém pode me explicar o porque ?

Re: HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:18 am
by Erowid
HM is never allowed and players are encouraged to use 1.30 or 1.41 so this problem can finally end.

Re: HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 1:44 pm
by perrinoia
I never punish people for HM, because I know that there is no proof positive method of detecting it, and most of the people accused are innocent, so I don't even try.

If I think someone is happy modding, I ridicule them for cheating, but I do not actually banish them for it.

Unless someone actually admits they're using it and refuses to stop, that's pretty much the only scenario when I would use admin powers to enforce that rule.

Re: HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 1:52 pm
by DESTROID
Thank you

One more thing.

LM | Lunatic Chick
Rev | Bonneville

I think it's just the names. Are administrators?

They confirmed that a player used HM and not banned
player: Spinec

I even without administrator role found out he was HM.

But for me no matter whether to use still will not be easy to kill me.

I just want to tell what happened.

Thanks you!

_____________________________ Portugues
Obrigado

Mais uma coisa.

LM|Lunaticchick
Rev| Borneville

Acho que é assim os nomes. São administradores ?

Confirmaram que um jogador usava HM e não o baniram
jogador: Spinec
_____________________

Re: HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 2:05 pm
by Firelord
If you're referring to Snipec, then you banned BR Owner.

Re: HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 2:16 pm
by The EcKo
Lmao oops

Re: HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 2:20 pm
by DESTROID
Complicated if the owner does not respect the rules who will respect?

Re: HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 2:41 pm
by Owner
If you think that...sure let your mind speak that way. I can say the same thing about people who i suspect but cant prove anything. In this age of this game if you cant prove anything, move on. That is all i can say. And if im kicking ass like most do well then you have room to improve. Im done speaking. BTW its 2016 not 1998. And no i do not support HM. If that was going to be your next question. Its been answered.

Re: HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 3:58 pm
by {LS}RePublic
perrinoia wrote:I never punish people for HM, because I know that there is no proof positive method of detecting it, and most of the people accused are innocent, so I don't even try.

If I think someone is happy modding, I ridicule them for cheating, but I do not actually banish them for it.

Unless someone actually admits they're using it and refuses to stop, that's pretty much the only scenario when I would use admin powers to enforce that rule.
I agree with this.

Re: HM is authorized?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:06 pm
by DaJ4ck3L
yes kicks will be given to hm users, but this is only to be done after careful observation from a veteran admin / player to verify if the hm is real or not.

please use smarts when handling hm users.