HM is authorized?

Locked
User avatar
DESTROID
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:46 pm

HM is authorized?

Post by DESTROID »

Hey people

The '' management '' the server BR are not banishing players using HM?

Can anyone explain to me why?

_________________

Eae galera

Os '' administradores '' do server BR não estão mais banindo jogadores que usam HM ?

Alguém pode me explicar o porque ?
Image
User avatar
Erowid
Site Admin
Posts: 684
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:02 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by Erowid »

HM is never allowed and players are encouraged to use 1.30 or 1.41 so this problem can finally end.
__________________________________
____________________________________________________
Image
Image
Image
Image


Image
perrinoia
Site Admin
Posts: 3732
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:18 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by perrinoia »

I never punish people for HM, because I know that there is no proof positive method of detecting it, and most of the people accused are innocent, so I don't even try.

If I think someone is happy modding, I ridicule them for cheating, but I do not actually banish them for it.

Unless someone actually admits they're using it and refuses to stop, that's pretty much the only scenario when I would use admin powers to enforce that rule.
Image
User avatar
DESTROID
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:46 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by DESTROID »

Thank you

One more thing.

LM | Lunatic Chick
Rev | Bonneville

I think it's just the names. Are administrators?

They confirmed that a player used HM and not banned
player: Spinec

I even without administrator role found out he was HM.

But for me no matter whether to use still will not be easy to kill me.

I just want to tell what happened.

Thanks you!

_____________________________ Portugues
Obrigado

Mais uma coisa.

LM|Lunaticchick
Rev| Borneville

Acho que é assim os nomes. São administradores ?

Confirmaram que um jogador usava HM e não o baniram
jogador: Spinec
_____________________
Image
User avatar
Firelord
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 11:08 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by Firelord »

If you're referring to Snipec, then you banned BR Owner.
The EcKo
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 12:32 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by The EcKo »

Lmao oops
User avatar
DESTROID
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:46 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by DESTROID »

Complicated if the owner does not respect the rules who will respect?
Image
Owner
Site Admin
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by Owner »

If you think that...sure let your mind speak that way. I can say the same thing about people who i suspect but cant prove anything. In this age of this game if you cant prove anything, move on. That is all i can say. And if im kicking ass like most do well then you have room to improve. Im done speaking. BTW its 2016 not 1998. And no i do not support HM. If that was going to be your next question. Its been answered.
Last edited by Owner on Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
{LS}RePublic
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:04 am

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by {LS}RePublic »

perrinoia wrote:I never punish people for HM, because I know that there is no proof positive method of detecting it, and most of the people accused are innocent, so I don't even try.

If I think someone is happy modding, I ridicule them for cheating, but I do not actually banish them for it.

Unless someone actually admits they're using it and refuses to stop, that's pretty much the only scenario when I would use admin powers to enforce that rule.
I agree with this.
Image
User avatar
DaJ4ck3L
Crow{OZ}
Posts: 3375
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:51 pm
Contact:

Re: HM is authorized?

Post by DaJ4ck3L »

yes kicks will be given to hm users, but this is only to be done after careful observation from a veteran admin / player to verify if the hm is real or not.

please use smarts when handling hm users.
Image
Locked